Many ways to skin the proverbial cat, Rich. Lang's is one fine
method. Clark at Cornell used the tetrahedral (hydrophone array and a
4-channel recorder) pattern to track bowhead whale numbers and
location in the Beaufort Sea a while back. And yours is no doubt
viable, too. I disparage, disregard, or sniff at none of these
worthwhile efforts and continue to experiment with various M-S
combinations. Whatever brings more light to the subject and makes
folks happy, makes me real happy. I only point out that it's kinda
hard for most folks to hear the benefits of these efforts for reasons
posted in yesterday's exchange.
Bernie
>So why did my technique get disregarded?
>I assure you it is real surround.
>It also would make more sense to use my favorite technique for
>research species sampling then the "real" Lang approach.
>
>Rich
>
>--- In Walter Knapp <>
>wrote:
>> From: Curt Olson <>
>>
>>
>> > But what Lang is trying to describe to us here is making perfect
>sense
>> > to me. This is the first time ever that I have not dismissed the
>notion
>> > of "surround sound" with a disrespectful sniff.
>>
>> To me the criteria Lang set up are the only "surround sound", the
>other
>> is just more elaborate stereo.
>>
>> Walt
>>
>
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
--
Wild Sanctuary, Inc.
P. O. Box 536
Glen Ellen, California 95442-0536
Tel: (707) 996-6677
Fax: (707) 996-0280
http://www.wildsanctuary.com
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|