Yes, Dan, that is correct, but in the same time both you and me know that a
studio recordist may very well choose a certain mic because "it picks out
the best of an acoustical guitar" or "if gives a warm color with this
particular singer".
I don't know of any clever sound recordist who select a microphone for a
particular task, by looking at the frequency curve.
Or have I misunderstood it? Wasn't this the topic?
Klas.
At 16:22 2004-02-25 -0800, you wrote:
>Walt, you wrote,
>
>>To say nothing of natural sound not being some kind of even distribution
>>of all frequencies, or a single frequency as are the popular methods of
>>testing.
>
>Neither is music, but that doesn't make tones and pink noise any less
>useful for testing musical equipment.
>
>-Dan Dugan
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
email:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|