Subject: | Re: the nature of parabolic reflectors |
---|---|
From: | Walter Knapp <> |
Date: | Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:21:07 -0500 |
From: "Rich Peet" <> > Looks pretty close to 1. Maybe as high as 1.2. Will check it closer > when I get my Sharp-tailed Grouse Blind time in shortly. Wish my > preamp would get back here. At 1 your mic diaphragm would be at the same level as that straightedge. And if it's 1.2, you are about the same as the Telinga, mic diaphragm between the straightedge and the dish, close to the same ratio. And we have a problem in that your large dish and the Telinga should have very similar gain curves. And that something else is at work. Walt ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: King Rail vs. Virginia Rail, evertveldhuis |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Trouble accessing files., Barb Beck |
Previous by Thread: | Re: the nature of parabolic reflectors, Walter Knapp |
Next by Thread: | Re: the nature of parabolic reflectors, Walter Knapp |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU