 |
birding-aus
|
|
|
birding-aus
|
| To: | 'Martin Butterfield' <>, martin cachard <> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | An unfortunate way to tick a Frogmouth |
| From: | Peter Shute <> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:00:28 +1000 |
Martin Butterfield wrote: > What is the default position on natural vs human transport? > That is, if a corpse is found somewhere do you start by > counting it as getting there naturally (eg washed ashore by > currents; dropped by a raptor) or assume that a human must > have got it there? If you're talking about counting it as being present in an area, does it matter if it got there by natural means or not? I would have thought that to be counted as living in the area, it needs to have got there itself. A raptor could easily bring it to an area where that species is never found alive. Peter Shute _______________________________________________ Birding-Aus mailing list To change settings or unsubscribe visit: http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org |
| Previous by Date: | An unfortunate way to tick a Frogmouth, Denise Goodfellow |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | An unfortunate way to tick a Frogmouth, Sonja Ross |
| Previous by Thread: | An unfortunate way to tick a Frogmouth, Martin Butterfield |
| Next by Thread: | Unfortunate way to tick a frogmouth, brian fleming |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU