D'no reason for it to be fuscus fuscus' or did you mean "no reason for it not
to be fuscus fuscus"It still looks wrong structurally to me for fuscus fuscus
(I agree with Nicolas Haass on this & his views!). It just looks too heavy and
not slender enough to me! But perhaps its on the upper end of the scale - a
large male or something? Time will tell!
Rob Morris
Brisbane, Australia
> From:
> To:
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 07:51:56 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Lesser Black-backed Gull at Broome tip- Birdforum
> Discussion Update
>
>
> Hey all,
>
> For those of you wishing for more foreign input the discussion on birdforum:
>
> http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=249211
>
> is that the bird belongs to the fuscus group and that there is no reason for
> it to be fuscus fuscus.
>
> It's been a very interesting discussion.
>
> Thank you all,
>
> D.
>
>
>
> ===============================
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to:
>
> http://birding-aus.org
> ===============================
===============================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
http://birding-aus.org
===============================
|