Thanks to everyone for your replies! My friend doing the recording
project will now use 48 khz to allow for a longer sequence of up to 2
hours, just in case her Pied Butcherbird sings for more than one
hour. Usually one hour is enough to capture a full cycle of the pre-
dawn song, but sometimes they go longer. And there was no problem in
joining the two files made using 96 kHz setting.
When one travels huge distances and makes a supreme effort to get a
recording, it is great to know that naturerecordists members from
around the world are so ready and willing to help out with almost
instant advice!
thanks so much,
Vicki Powys
>
> From: vickipowys [naturerecordists]<natu=
> >
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 12:07 PM
> To: <=
com
> >
> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Continuous long tracks with Olympus
> LS11
>
> Many thanks Peter Shute! I guess the really long recordings people
> make are done on recorders other than the Olympus LS series?
>
> Vicki Powys
>
>
> On 18/08/2016, at 1:06 PM, Peter Shute <=
w.org.au
> >
> [naturerecordists] wrote:
>
>> I just checked the LS-10 manual, and it says it creates a new file
>> once it reaches 2GB. 65 minutes sounds about right for 96kHz.
>>
>> Peter Shute
>>
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|