naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: better recorder or better microphone-dilemma

Subject: Re: better recorder or better microphone-dilemma
From: "Luis do Carmo" lecarmo
Date: Fri Oct 4, 2013 7:30 am ((PDT))
I believe you'll be fine with the set you chose, but I do not think the ME6=
7 is "better" than the NTG-2. The ME67 is "different" from the NTG-2 and th=
ey should not even be directly compared, as the former is a long shotgun an=
d the later a short shotgun mic. It would be correct if you'd put the ME66 =
into comparison with a NTG-2 (or 1) and defining which is better is a matte=
r of taste.

Luis



From: Jacek Malanka <>
To: "" <>
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [Nature Recordists] RE: better recorder or better micropho=
ne-dilemma



=A0
thank U. Your analysis is very clear and logical.=A0I decide to buy a bette=
r microphone and=A0cheaper=A0recorder without xlr - sennheiser me67/k6 with=
 sony pcm m10. U think this set is ok?=A0





---In  <> =
wrote:


Hi,
What do you think is better - buy marantz pmd 661 + rode ntg-2 or buy cheap=
er recorder like olympus LS-12 or sony PCM 10 but with Sennheiser K6/ME67. =
Which solution will give me better sound quality? I might add that I am mos=
t interested in recording owls. In first line owls and then other birds. I =
think the first solution is better because of xlr (in the future I could ch=
ange the microphone) , but if you have other experiences, suggestions and t=
ips then correct me.
Jacek







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU