And what about tascam dr-40 with sennheiser me67/k6? Tascam have xlr input =
and sony don't have. which solution is better - sony whithout xlr input or =
tascam with xlr? what with noise?
From: Luis do Carmo <>
To: "" <>
Sent: Friday, October 4, 2013 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [Nature Recordists] RE: better recorder or better micropho=
ne-dilemma
=C2=A0
I believe you'll be fine with the set you chose, but I do not think the ME6=
7 is "better" than the NTG-2. The ME67 is "different" from the NTG-2 and th=
ey should not even be directly compared, as the former is a long shotgun an=
d the later a short shotgun mic. It would be correct if you'd put the ME66 =
into comparison with a NTG-2 (or 1) and defining which is better is a matte=
r of taste.
Luis
From: Jacek Malanka <>
To: "" <>
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [Nature Recordists] RE: better recorder or better micropho=
ne-dilemma
=C2=A0
thank U. Your analysis is very clear and logical.=C2=A0I decide to buy a be=
tter microphone and=C2=A0cheaper=C2=A0recorder without xlr - sennheiser me6=
7/k6 with sony pcm m10. U think this set is ok?=C2=A0
---In <> =
wrote:
Hi,
What do you think is better - buy marantz pmd 661 + rode ntg-2 or buy cheap=
er recorder like olympus LS-12 or sony PCM 10 but with Sennheiser K6/ME67. =
Which solution will give me better sound quality? I might add that I am mos=
t interested in recording owls. In first line owls and then other birds. I =
think the first solution is better because of xlr (in the future I could ch=
ange the microphone) , but if you have other experiences, suggestions and t=
ips then correct me.
Jacek
|