>
> Could the variability in sensitivity between Telinga SSM microphones be a=
factor?
Do we have the specs?
>
> Variably between stock EM172 capsules sensitivity(+ or - 3dB) would certa=
inly exhibit noticeable differences in the range of recorder EIN we are tal=
king about.
The mic input / preamps of the recorders varies quite a bit even taking int=
o consideration Raimunds figures. -The noise I found is present around 8Khz=
, the Shure 189 capsule does not exhibit this same bump at 8Khz despite bei=
ng technically higher noise...
> Also, could stated em172 variability in impedance (+ or - 30%)play any ro=
le in noise differences between different setups? I don't know anything abo=
ut that.
Probably.
The best sounding configuration Ive attained with the EM172's is powering t=
hem via
a battery box then into a 1:20 transformer (Sowter) (+26dB) to the line inp=
ut of the recorder (Sony D50) - this is quieter than the D50's own mic pre,=
which is already very quiet by most portable recorder standards.... YMMV.=
-Mike.
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|