I like that answer!
Still, I think the "unclarity" resembles the debate decades ago, when
there was a lot of talk about impedance matching, preamps and
transformers. Some combinations between dynamic mic=B4s, input
transformers and transistors worked, others did not, and noone
actually knew why, even though "everybody" said they did.
Klas
At 21:52 2012-12-16, you wrote:
> > "We strive to make the natural ambient be the dominant noise, but
> > it's far from simple with so many variables."
> >
> > Yes, Dan and as I see it, (perhaps I am wrong) the variables have
> > recently become many more, and more difficult to understand.
>
>It used to be mic noise, preamp noise, and tape noise. Now it's mic
>noise, preamp noise, conversion noise, and post-conversion gain
>changes either in the recorder or in post.
>
>Basically the conversion noise is the "medium" like the tape, but
>it's so much lower that the process becomes easier to use (if not to
>understand).
>
>-Dan
>
>------------------------------------
>
>"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
>sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
email:
website: www.telinga.com
|