| Subject: | Re: Sony PCM-M10 vs Zoom H4n best for outdoors / capturing frogs in |
|---|---|
| From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
| Date: | Thu Feb 9, 2012 3:16 pm ((PST)) |
> One thing that seems important to master for now, esp when using the buil= t-in mics, is removing microphone hiss with Audacity. Do you recommend this= method?: No. Noise-removing algorithms damage the sound irreparably. There are of us= e in forensics, and in constructing mixes for film, where destroying the am= bience of a particular clip doesn't matter because another ambience is bein= g mixed in. The way to avoid hiss is to get the mics closer to the source, or use quiet= er mics. -Dan |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Sony PCM-M10 vs Zoom H4n best for outdoors / capturing frogs in, Rich DDT |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: M10 noise removal, was Sony PCM-M10 vs Zoom H4n best for outdoor, Peter Shute |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Sony PCM-M10 vs Zoom H4n best for outdoors / capturing frogs in, Rich DDT |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Sony PCM-M10 vs Zoom H4n best for outdoors / capturing frogs in, robin_parmar_sound |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU