naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Replacement for my Remembird

Subject: Re: Replacement for my Remembird
From: "Klas Strandberg" klasstrandberg
Date: Wed Feb 9, 2011 11:22 am ((PST))
I have not used the ME66 a lot, but made lots of AB recordings (and
parabol) with the ME62.
I agree that 16 dbA is a reasonable value, not only because the self
noise is "good enough," but also because it is hard to find a mic in
the same price range which is quieter, except NT1A which many find
too bulky + needs phantom power.

Remember that balanced outputs (XLR's) are used to eliminate hum
induced from mains cables indoors. So it is smart of Sennheiser to
make a microphone with balanced output and phantom power + also make
it running from a battery.

I can measure the 1,5 - 2 dbA lower self noise of the Telinga
Clip-On's, compared to ME62, but I cannot hear it. That my hearing
nowadays drop dead above 16kHz, is not important, as the most
disturbing noise is in the region 2- 10 kHz.

I will also point out (again!) that I frequently have customers
complaining about self noise, while the problem is that they have
headphones / loudspeakers made to emphasize effects in pop music, not
to speak about all people having their PC loudspeakers only.

Klas


At 13:48 2011-02-09, you wrote:
> > Actually, not. Quiet forest or desert ambiences show up the
> > self-noise of mics mercilessly. That's why Rob Danielson made a
> > specification of 16dBA or lower for mics suitable for quiet
> > ambiences.
>
>Dan,
>
>That must have been A-weighted. CCIR 468-3 gives about a 11dB higher
>figure but it is a peak measurement not RMS. This noise measurement
>covers hiss, which is the noise that worries us. The 468 curve
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITU-R_468_noise_weighting
>shows the difference from the A-curve. Note the noise figure is
>actually excess noise over basic thermal noise. A mic "signal to noise
>ratio" is just about meaningless as we are looking at a noise to
>signal ratio.
>
>Where we gain with internally powered mics is in swamping the mixer or
>recorder input noise. We blame the mic but it's doing its best. I
>think I would aim for a 468 weighted noise figure of 26dB or lower.
>
>There is a solution to hiss. Filter out everything below 10kHz and if
>there aren't nature noises up there, filter it out.
>
>David
>
>David Brinicombe
>North Devon, UK
>Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
>sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
email: 
website: www.telinga.com









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU