naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Replacement for my Remembird

Subject: Re: Replacement for my Remembird
From: "Paul Jacobson" thebrunswicktwitcher
Date: Sat Feb 12, 2011 9:02 pm ((PST))
Hi David,

Interesting.  To my ear there is quite a lot of distortion and "space monkeys" 
from the noise reduction process.

I've posted an similar section from that recording with noise reduction done in 
Izotope RX2. I used a short section of hiss which had -- as far as I could hear 
-- only hiss as the base sample for the noise reduction, and have left the 
settings at defaults. Providing you can get  a clean section of baseline noise 
RX2 can work wonders. 

I think if you were able to use a "bunker" sample of mic/preamp system noise as 
a baseline sample for RX2 the results could be very good indeed.

The original recording being used suffers a little as the Oade mod on the HDP2 
exposes some very low level, non-steady state,  system noise which can't be 
removed by this process. Fortunately it is only really apparent in very quiet 
recordings played back at high gain.

http://soundcloud.com/offtracksound/predawn-nr-for-db

cheers
Paul





On 13/02/2011, at 1:26 PM, Avocet wrote:

> Paul,
> 
> I've taken the liberty of doing a split frequency noise reduction on
> your recording. It's optimised? from 30 secs in. I like it - it's 
> moody.
> 
> It's briefly on http://www.stowford.org/sounds/predawnnr.mp3
> 
> David










<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU