Subject: | Re: Another neophyte flailing around on this subject... |
---|---|
From: | "Marinos Koutsomichalis" marinoskouts= |
omichalis Date: Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:04 am ((PDT)) On 13 =CE=91=CF=85=CE=B3 2010, at 2:25 =CE=BC.=CE=BC., James Shatto wrote: > Well in theory the upper harmonics do re-enforce the lower ones, which ar= e in the capabilities of a lot of ears If you have any scientific references on this I' d love to have a look.. I = might be wrong on this but I believe this is mainly just a myth.. This is a subject already discussed a lot generally - Indeed, when I' m wor= king in quality studios in high sampling rates and then switch to lower one= s, it sometimes seems like I can sense a subtle difference - but I' m not r= eally sure if this is actually happening and what would be the real reason = for this.. I guess I can easily figure this out via AB tests and such - it would worth= trying at some point.. m |
Previous by Date: | Re: Another neophyte flailing around on this subject..., Scott Fraser |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Another neophyte flailing around on this subject..., James Shatto |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Another neophyte flailing around on this subject..., Scott Fraser |
Next by Thread: | Re: Another neophyte flailing around on this subject..., James Shatto |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU