| Subject: | Re: Another neophyte flailing around on this subject... |
|---|---|
| From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
| Date: | Fri Aug 13, 2010 9:59 am ((PDT)) |
> Well in theory the upper harmonics do re-enforce the lower ones, which ar= e in the capabilities of a lot of ears. So it does make a difference. I beg to differ. Harmonics beyond the range of hearing aren't audible, in o= r out. Lots of nature sounds have supersonic components, though, so I'm not= arguing against wide-band recording, just about audibility. You can hear t= he supersonic stuff when you slow the recording down. -Dan |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Another neophyte flailing around on this subject..., Dan Dugan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Another neophyte flailing around on this subject..., Dan Dugan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Another neophyte flailing around on this subject..., Dan Dugan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Another neophyte flailing around on this subject..., Dan Dugan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU