naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: from metadata to archiving

Subject: Re: from metadata to archiving
From: "vickipowys" vpowys
Date: Thu Apr 22, 2010 7:38 pm ((PDT))
Hi John,

But even if I open a WAV file on my Mac, and keep it in WAV format,  
if I "save" that file then I still lose the date-time information.    
I thought this happened on a PC too?

cheers,

Vicki


On 23/04/2010, at 12:25 PM, John Lundsten wrote:

> Hi Vicki
> Simple forget AIFF, Macs are set up by default to trash all the useful
> metadata contained in a Broadcast WAV. I don't have a Mac available  
> right
> now to give precise info how to tame this Apple Corp abuse/ 
> nonsense/ BS, but
> for sure Macs can use wav files just fine, both plain ones or with  
> the bext
> (BWF) extra goodies.
> IMO this is major Corporate BS, hubris & outrageous arrogance on  
> Apples part
> to assume their late 20th century format has any relevance at all  
> to anyone
> in the 21st Century.
> John L
>
> vickipowys" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 1:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] from metadata to archiving
>
>
> | Sorry to throw in a really dumb question, BUT
> |
> | If I make a recording on a flash-card recorder then it gets
> | automatically date and time stamped (always assuming that I have set
> | the time-date correctly in the reccorder).
> |
> | When I later process the recording (let's say I remove 5 minutes of
> | footsteps and preserve one minute of birdsong), then I am left with
> | an AIFF file on a Mac that has lost the date and time stamp.
> |
> | Are you proposing that the ideal way for archiving is to then re-
> | embed time, date and additional data that will be permanently tagged
> | to the sound file?
> |
> | For the moment I'm sticking with my manual database, thanks all the
> | same, and verbal announcements regarding species name, description,
> | behaviour, place, weather, etc.
> |
> | cheers,
> |
> | Vicki
> |
> |
> |
> | On 23/04/2010, at 9:04 AM, Rob Danielson wrote:
> |
> | > Hi John et al--
> | >
> | > In the model I'm suggesting, the database would create files with
> | > embedded metadata. Hopefully this feature can serve a very
> | > significant role in getting important data people want into the
> | > consolidation app; maybe Charles' ixml project can eventually  
> aspire
> | > towards creating agreement about how to assign the chunks. Strong
> | > agreement is needed in the tag dept, or there's more trouble than
> | > return.
> | >
> | > snip...........
> |
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ----------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.814 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2828 - Release Date:  
> 04/22/10
> 07:31:00
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie  
> Krause
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU