naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LS-10 plus DPA 4060

Subject: Re: LS-10 plus DPA 4060
From: "Bernie Krause" bigchirp1
Date: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:17 am ((PST))
You know, Robin, it's all a compromise: price vs quality, one set of  
ears vs another, field sites with lots of signal vs quieter ones,  
noise floor vs transparency. There is no absolute. Just a matter of  
preference.

Bernie


On Nov 15, 2009, at 6:59 AM, Robin wrote:

> I know the DPA 4060 are small and have a nice frequency response,  
> but the noise seems too much. By my calculations the EIN is -103  
> dBu(A). The low-sensitivity 4061 seems a better deal at -110 dBu(A),  
> so long as you have enough clean gain in the recorder. Aren't there  
> quieter options?
>
> I am confused in this regard; my respect for Chris Watson, Bernie  
> Krause, etc. encourages me to understand their choices.
>
> -- robin
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie  
> Krause
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Wild Sanctuary
POB 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677
http://www.wildsanctuary.com

Google Earth zooms: http://earth.wildsanctuary.com
SKYPE: biophony










<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU