Subject: | Re: LS-10 plus DPA 4060 |
---|---|
From: | "Robin" escalation746 |
Date: | Sun Nov 15, 2009 4:56 pm ((PST)) |
Rob Danielson wrote: > The noise ratings and computations, like those on > the Rane Table 3, http://rane.com/note148.html rarely > match real world noise performance. One reason for that would be the differing frequency response of the noise. Another would be differences in the measurement of the figures we pop into the chart. No manufacturer ever says much about the bandwidth over which their SPL calculations were made, for example. It would be very easy for variations from manufacturer specs to change the look-up EIN results by a few dB. And, as you say, we can distinguish well under a dB. So the variation we get is way over any reasonable JND. (That's why I value Raimund's work and others who provide a consistent measurement environment.) -- robin |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LS-10 plus DPA 4060, Dan Dugan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LS-10 plus DPA 4060, Robin |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LS-10 plus DPA 4060, Dan Dugan |
Next by Thread: | Re: LS-10 plus DPA 4060, Robin |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU