| Subject: | Re: comparing 20 portable digital recorders |
|---|---|
| From: | "Robin" escalation746 |
| Date: | Mon Nov 9, 2009 6:22 pm ((PST)) |
oryoki, I've cleaned up the article by removing paragraphs that were better placed in the second installment. Plus I've added a few more words about the technical terms. Thanks for the good advice! (P.S. I've always wondered why you chose that alias?) -- robin |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: comparing 20 portable digital recorders, Rob Danielson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: comparing 20 portable digital recorders, Robin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: comparing 20 portable digital recorders, Rob Danielson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: comparing 20 portable digital recorders, Robin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU