| Subject: | Re: comparing 20 portable digital recorders |
|---|---|
| From: | "escalation746" escalation746 |
| Date: | Mon Nov 9, 2009 9:54 am ((PST)) |
oryoki2000 wrote: Thank you for your suggestions! You are right that I need to explain some of the jargon. I have done so in previous articles and so will copy and paste so it is all centralised here. I do in fact link to Raimund Specht's site. The remainder of your concerns will hopefully be answered by the follow-up article, where I apply the criteria and make some recommendations. -- robin |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: comparing 20 portable digital recorders, escalation746 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: comparing 20 portable digital recorders, Rob Danielson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: comparing 20 portable digital recorders, escalation746 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: comparing 20 portable digital recorders, Rob Danielson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU