Subject: | Re: Behringer UBB1002 |
---|---|
From: | "Kim Cascone" anechoicmedia |
Date: | Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:40 am ((PDT)) |
Aaron no problem...I just wanted to make sure we are giving a manufacturer a fair and empirical evaluation as is the case when we are evaluating microphones and preamps as a group and although a repair tech on this list reported seeing a disproportionate amount of Behringer gear in for repair at his shop this is circumstantial data that points to a probable condition but can't be used to arrive at any definite conclusions about quality of Behringer gear so I'll gladly continue to be the canary in the coal-mine (or penguin in the water) for the list and test the UBB1002 in December also, I just wanted to say that this list is a gold mine of information and has allowed me to evaluate and purchase affordable gear that has vastly improved my craft peace :) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 2. Re: Small field recorder - clean line input, Curt Olson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | review of Nagra VI, oryoki2000 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Behringer UBB1002, Aaron Ximm |
Next by Thread: | Re: Behringer UBB1002, aaron s |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU