| Subject: | Re: Behringer UBB1002 |
|---|---|
| From: | "Kim Cascone" anechoicmedia |
| Date: | Mon Sep 22, 2008 9:15 am ((PDT)) |
> Their mixers are made with cheap surface-mount technology, but then so > are others these days. I am not sure I'd trust them much in the field. > Pop a solder joint and the thing is dead. On a desk they are fine. curious, but do you have real data to back up your claim that Behringer is made with *cheap* surface-mount technology? if it is - then we should all read it and be wary of using their products in the field or elsewhere FYI: Sound Devices uses SMT as do many other professional audio products for the field http://tinyurl.com/3m8otr I'm guessing that 'quality' might be more about rumor and aspersion than it is fact and data...? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 'All purpose' mic?, Max Catterwell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Behringer UBB1002, Aaron Ximm |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Behringer UBB1002, Marc Myers |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Behringer UBB1002, Aaron Ximm |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU