I suspect it has to do with a slower processor and disc, both selected
for low power consumption.
-Dan Dugan
> Would it be dependent on the chipset used?
>
> <L>
> On Apr 11, 2008, at 4:42 PM, Dan Dugan wrote:
>
>> I suspect it has to do with the overall data rate--while recording to
>> three media simultaneously.
>>
>> -Dan Dugan
>>
>>> I saw this, and am pretty bummed. I wonder why they chose to do
>>> that? I know it's geared for production sound recordists, but still,
>>> a lot of FX people and musicians would die to have 8 channels of
>>> 96k. I think they lost a nice opportunity there.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Please note that according to the specs it only supports
>>>> up to 24 bit
>>>>
>>>> 48.048 kHz (which is a film format). No 24/96 that I can see.
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie
> Krause
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
|