| Subject: | Re: [gear] Sound Devices 788 T announced |
|---|---|
| From: | "Mark R." seoulgypsy |
| Date: | Sun Apr 13, 2008 11:06 am ((PDT)) |
>only 48kHz sampling sounds to me as a big step back! >If 8 channels at 24bit & 96 kHz could be a constraint, I would have >appreciated the option to record 4 or 6 channels at 96 kHz, or maybe >to reduce to 16 bit for recording 8x96kHz. Haven't we had this discussion quite frequently? I am asking those who can explain, but even with Sound Device's low noise preamps, there would still be nothing gained by going up to 96, would there? Wouldn't the noise and definition at nature recording levels retain an optimum level for even the lowest mic noise and SD preamp combination? Perplexed with Warm Regards, Mark R. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [gear] Sound Devices 788 T announced, J. Young |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [gear] Sound Devices 788 T announced, Michael Raphael |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [gear] Sound Devices 788 T announced, J. Young |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [gear] Sound Devices 788 T announced, Michael Raphael |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU