| Subject: | Re: [gear] Sound Devices 788 T announced |
|---|---|
| From: | "" supernielsen |
| Date: | Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:34 pm ((PDT)) |
I saw this, and am pretty bummed. I wonder why they chose to do that? I kno= w it's geared for production sound recordists, but still, a lot of FX peopl= e and musicians would die to have 8 channels of 96k. I think they lost a ni= ce opportunity there. > Please note that according to the specs it only supports up to= 24 bit > >48.048 kHz (which is a film format). No 24/96 that I can see. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [gear] Sound Devices 788 T announced, Greg Weddig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [gear] Sound Devices 788 T announced, Dan Dugan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [gear] Sound Devices 788 T announced, Greg Weddig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [gear] Sound Devices 788 T announced, Dan Dugan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU