naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mkh-8020

Subject: Re: mkh-8020
From: "Aaron Ximm" aaron_gmail
Date: Thu Jan 10, 2008 11:43 am ((PST))
>
> I'd be more interested in how they did with low frequencies, the MKH-20
> could use a little better in the low end. But the MKH-110 kind of are a
> unfair comparison.
>

Heya Walt!

Seeing your comment on this knocked a small rock out of my head -- you know=
,
I think I had a pair of 110's sent to your place like two years ago (?)
(maybe even more!?) and by now if you haven't put them to use, they must be
completely gone to dust and rust!  E r p.

Does that ring any bells for you? I think I was going to try to find SASS
parts to see if I could sweet talk you into an SASS-110 setup, but then got
sidetracked and I'd completely forgotten about it until just now!

Humm. Well if you think you might still have 'em maybe I should look into
that, though I'd be impressed if you were still in the SASS-fabrication
"business"!

In any event... happy new year!

 best,
  aaron

--
 
 quietamerican.org
 oneminutevacation.org

 83% happy
  9% disgusted
  6% fearful
  2% angry







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU