naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mkh-8020

Subject: Re: mkh-8020
From: "Walter Knapp" waltknapp
Date: Thu Jan 10, 2008 11:29 am ((PST))
Posted by: "Martyn Stewart"
>
> Has anyone in the group used a couple of mkh-8020's yet, did i miss a =

> report? how are they compared to the mkh-20's frequency levels are
> much higher so using a faster sample/bit rate would be great for
> insects etc?
> I would appreciate any info before i delve into the market again.. i
> have some different biomes/countries to get to this year so now is the =

> time to try out new things..
> Any good in high humidity etc?

Would love to compare them to the MKH-20 in the SASS, but no money for
such things.

I'd be more interested in how they did with low frequencies, the MKH-20
could use a little better in the low end. But the MKH-110 kind of are a
unfair comparison.

Walt




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU