At 2:35 PM -0600 11/17/07, Curt Olson wrote:
>Paul Jacobson wrote:
>
>> I've been using a "Curt Clone" rig, with some variations due to
>> different local standard timber sizing. The pine boards I've used are
>> about 10mm narrower and 5mm thinner which will reduce the
>> boundary/barrier effect somewhat compared to Curt's original design.
>> Even so, the rig seems to give quite nice results.
>
>Indeed. Your recordings are superb.
>
>> I've also made up cages out of "mouse mesh" with fake fur windshields
>> that have really helped in breezy conditions.
>>
> > <http://www.mactrix.com.au/node/24>http://www.mactrix.com.au/node/24
> > <http://www.mactrix.com.au/node/25>http://www.mactrix.com.au/node/25
>> <http://www.mactrix.com.au/node/32>http://www.mactrix.com.au/node/32
>
>Thank you for these links, Paul. I have some of the same kind of mesh,
>and will be following your example in the next few days.
>
>Curt Olson
Hi Paul
Thanks for sharing the developments and fine recordings, I've been
using & evaluating Curt's rig designs as well. Do you happen to know
which of Curt's designs you used to make
http://www.mactrix.com.au/files/recordings/MtSamaria_Edit.mp3 ? The
stereo imaging/local reflections create terrific spatiality. I think
I'm detecting less low frequency response in the dead center which
I've not observed before with his rigs; I'm curious which boundary
arrangement you used. Rob D.
--
|