naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: 16 Bit & 24 Bit recordings

from [Scott Fraser] [Permanent Link][Original]
Subject: Re: 16 Bit & 24 Bit recordings
From: "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser
Date: Fri May 25, 2007 11:42 am ((PDT)) 
<<Sorry if this adding to the confusion but no one has
mentioned 96kHz sampling rate?
Would this make 'more' of a difference than 24 bits
would perhaps to any recording?>>

In my experience, & that of the golden-eared producers I often work
with, the difference between 16 & 24 bit is hugely more discernible
than the difference between 44.1k & any higher sampling rates.

Scott Fraser
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Digest Number 3548, Meena Haribal
Next by Date:  Re: 16 Bit & 24 Bit recordings, Danny Meltzer
Previous by Thread:  Re: 16 Bit & 24 Bit recordings, Tim Nielsen
Next by Thread:  Re: 16 Bit & 24 Bit recordings, Danny Meltzer
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU