Why would they have 24 bit converters, Lou? Why have the facility of having
the option of recording in 16 bit without dither and 16 bit with dither in
the menu? I think they are original 16 bit samples. Look also at the size o=
f
each file, the 24 bit is considerably larger than the 16 bit examples.
In my opinion with recording nature sounds, you can not detect the
difference with the naked ear and my ears are pretty good. To compare these
recordings side by side in a listening room is virtually like telling a goo=
d
Irish whiskey from a good Scottish whisky.
I can record 16 bit with the Nagra too and still get the same results.
I honestly believe too much time and effort has been spent on this thread t=
o
no avail.
Martyn
****************************************
Martyn Stewart
Bird and Animal Sounds Digitally Recorded at:
http://www.naturesound.org
Redmond. Washington. USA
N47.65543 W121.98428
e-mail:
Tel: 425-898-0462
Make every Garden a wildlife Habitat!
*****************************************
-----Original Message-----
From:
On Behalf Of Lou Judson
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 9:10 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] 16 Bit & 24 Bit recordings
Martyn, I have just seen this and not gone to hear them - but my
understanding is the SD machines have 24 bit convertors - so are these
dithered or not? I think the only fair test would be with everything
the same but use a 16 bit convertor, which the SD's don't have - this
is a dithered version of the 24 bit A/D, so not really the comparison
they seek, is it?
<L>
Lou Judson . Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689
On May 23, 2007, at 8:24 PM, Martyn Stewart wrote:
> Recorders used were Sound devices 722 & 744. Levels were left the same
> for
> each recording. No filtering was used. 16bit-mkh20 16bit-MKH-110
> 24bit-mkh-20 24bit-mkh-110.
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause
Yahoo! Groups Links
|