Re: 16 Bit & 24 Bit recordings

["Danny Meltzer" dannymeltzer]

I wholeheartedly agree.

24 bit is much richer sounding than 16 bit.

96khz is only a bit more defined than 48khz.

Of course...IMHO.

Danny

--- In  Scott Fraser
<> wrote:
>
> <<Sorry if this adding to the confusion but no one has
> mentioned 96kHz sampling rate?
> Would this make 'more' of a difference than 24 bits
> would perhaps to any recording?>>
>
> In my experience, & that of the golden-eared producers I often work
> with, the difference between 16 & 24 bit is hugely more discernible
> than the difference between 44.1k & any higher sampling rates.
>
> Scott Fraser
>
>
>
>