naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods

Subject: Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods
From: "Raimund Specht" animalsounds
Date: Wed May 9, 2007 6:48 am ((PDT))
Dan Dugan wrote:

> Calibrating the input to the exact same gain is useful, but it
> doesn't give you a way to match the sensitivities of different
> mics--I think that has to be done acoustically. Since mics can't be
> fitted into a sound level meter calibrator, a tone at a measured
> distance seems to be all that remains.

Yep. The electrical calibration method that I explained would of
course only make sense when one used the same microphone in exactly
the same arrangement (a setup in that only the recorder is being
exchanged). I think that this is what Rob D. is actually doing.

If one also wants to compare different microphones, things would get
even more complicated. I think that one would need a professional
anechoic test chamber to get reliable results. Otherwise, the room
acoustics (reflections from other directions) would introduce errors
that are caused by the different pick-up patterns of the various
microphones.

Regards,
Raimund






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU