Subject: | Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods |
---|---|
From: | "Walter Knapp" waltknapp |
Date: | Wed May 9, 2007 9:51 am ((PDT)) |
Posted by: "Dan Dugan" > Calibrating the input to the exact same gain is useful, but it > doesn't give you a way to match the sensitivities of different > mics--I think that has to be done acoustically. Since mics can't be > fitted into a sound level meter calibrator, a tone at a measured > distance seems to be all that remains. > Actually, you often can machine a adapter to use the standard calibrator with a mic. The usefulness of the calibration might be questionable, however, as the standard calibrator is one frequency and sound level. Walt |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods, Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Investing in high-end mics (was Fostex FR-2LE preamplifier noise, Scott Fraser |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods, Scott Fraser |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU