| Subject: | Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods |
|---|---|
| From: | "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser |
| Date: | Fri May 11, 2007 8:23 am ((PDT)) |
Walter Knapp stated: <<Enough, I've got a 50 mile ride to get out on, and I'm sure what I'm saying is being ignored.>> I wouldn't assume that at all. I think we can all hold divergent, even contradictory views in our heads simultaneously. And why wouldn't we want to hear, discuss & hopefully learn from the techniques & esthetics of different (yet related) disciplines? On the contrary, I'm sure what you're saying is NOT being ignored. Hopefully the reverse is also true. Scott Fraser |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 3. Re: Omni spacing for nature recording..., Greg Simmons |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Mystery Pond Frogs in NJ, pueo9 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods, Walter Knapp |
| Next by Thread: | Xeno-canto :: 2nd birthday, Roger Norwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU