Subject: | Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods |
---|---|
From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
Date: | Tue May 8, 2007 7:36 pm ((PDT)) |
>This is why pink noise is often preferred as a test signal when >speakers and/or mics are involved. Any comb filter cancellations will >tend to be in very specific octave related frequency ranges & not >have a large effect on overall RMS level. Also, being broadband, pink >noise is more relevant to real world sounds, including music. The pink noise I prefer for level setting is band-limited, 200 Hz to 2 KHz. That avoids room effects on low frequencies and variations in the high frequencies. Most surround sound systems use it to calibrate. -Dan Dugan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods, Dan Dugan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Fostex FR-2LE preamplifier noise: How does it compare to Sound, Walter Knapp |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods, Dan Dugan |
Next by Thread: | Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods, Raimund Specht |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU