Subject: | Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods |
---|---|
From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
Date: | Mon May 7, 2007 5:06 pm ((PDT)) |
Rob Danielson, you wrote, >Please do point-out where the method method is lacking... > >The only ear evaluation _I_ do is match playback levels. I make the >high res files available so folks can tweak a test segment up or down >a dB or two to match to their tastes which is quite easy and quick to >do with QT Pro I might add. I think that's the weakest point--where a distinction in noise level of perhaps one or two dB is being made, trying to match clock ticks by ear is too chancy for me. I suggest a 1 KHz tone from a speaker between the clocks for level matching, calibrated by measuring voltage at the speaker terminals. You can leave it out of the published movie. -Dan Dugan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 1. Re: The insult??, Martyn Stewart |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods, Scott Fraser |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods, Dan Dugan |
Next by Thread: | Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods, Scott Fraser |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU