Subject: | Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods |
---|---|
From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
Date: | Mon May 7, 2007 4:50 pm ((PDT)) |
Walt, you wrote, >I'm aware that what I hear is being filtered by my mind, and >the long run of use in the field is deliberately designed to get around >that as much as possible. Your contention that long experience tempers the effect of observer bias is...unscientific. Long experience also reinforces prejudices! That said, I have no doubt that the proof of the pudding is in the eating, and that equipment with inferior specs or test results may be superior in the field because of other factors of field-worthiness. -Dan Dugan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Equipment Testing Goals Methods, Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Xeno-canto :: 2nd birthday, Roger Norwood |
Previous by Thread: | Equipment Testing Goals Methods, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods, Dan Dugan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU