Subject: | Re: Sound Devices 702 |
---|---|
From: | "Richard Humphries" mdsfx |
Date: | Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:45 am ((PDT)) |
--- In "Rich Peet" <> wrote: > > I looked at the 702 and am not a fan of that product. > Why buy a unit that does not work. > The 702 is the 722 without the harddrive that can not be inserted by > the user. > I could have understood a 704 that contained 4 mic pre's that used the > space. Or a 702 that could have had the consumer install a harddrive > to make a 722. > > I own a 722 and usually record to the Flashdrive to save power. > > A Wisconsin based company should understand this way of thinking. > > Rich > who owns a 722 > I grew up mostly in Minnesota but with a couple years in Wisconsin and guess I too don't understand your way of thinking. I sold my Deva II with a hard drive and replaced it with a 702t with no hard drive. I don't miss the hard drive one bit, and I spent the money I saved on (a portion of) a new mic. My way of thinking says pay only for the options you need. -Richard |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Sound Devices 702, Michael Oster |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Digital Age Concerns, Walter Knapp |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Sound Devices 702, Michael Oster |
Next by Thread: | Re: Sound Devices 702, flawn@aol.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU