Subject: | Re: Sound Devices 702 |
---|---|
From: | "Rich Peet" richpeet |
Date: | Tue Mar 13, 2007 3:05 pm ((PDT)) |
I looked at the 702 and am not a fan of that product. Why buy a unit that does not work. The 702 is the 722 without the harddrive that can not be inserted by the user. I could have understood a 704 that contained 4 mic pre's that used the space. Or a 702 that could have had the consumer install a harddrive to make a 722. I own a 722 and usually record to the Flashdrive to save power. A Wisconsin based company should understand this way of thinking. Rich who owns a 722 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Sound Devices 702, Tim Nielsen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Sound Devices 702, Tim Nielsen |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Sound Devices 702, Tim Nielsen |
Next by Thread: | Re: Sound Devices 702, Tim Nielsen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU