But if you own a 722, and record to flash, then you're using a 702! I
don't understand your complaint at all. The 702 is exactly what you
say, a 722 with only flash memory. It's also $500 cheaper, and since
you get a 4 gig flash card for around $50 these days, for many
people, it's all that they'll need. I own a couple of 722's, but I'm
often recording a lot of material that wouldn't fit on flash memory,
so I like having the hard drive in there. But many people don't need it.
So explain what you mean by 'does not work'. The 702 is just an
option, they still sell 722s as well.
Tim
On Mar 13, 2007, at 3:05 PM, Rich Peet wrote:
> I looked at the 702 and am not a fan of that product.
> Why buy a unit that does not work.
> The 702 is the 722 without the harddrive that can not be inserted by
> the user.
> I could have understood a 704 that contained 4 mic pre's that used the
> space. Or a 702 that could have had the consumer install a harddrive
> to make a 722.
>
> I own a 722 and usually record to the Flashdrive to save power.
>
> A Wisconsin based company should understand this way of thinking.
>
> Rich
> who owns a 722
>
>
>
|