I do not agree with airline pricing or telcom pricing.
I would agree with the 702 if the user would be allowed to upgrade at
their choice to include a 722. Right now the 702 is an abortion having
a huge hole in the case.
Rich
--- In Tim Nielsen <> wrote:
>
> But if you own a 722, and record to flash, then you're using a 702! I =
> don't understand your complaint at all. The 702 is exactly what you
> say, a 722 with only flash memory. It's also $500 cheaper, and since
> you get a 4 gig flash card for around $50 these days, for many
> people, it's all that they'll need. I own a couple of 722's, but I'm
> often recording a lot of material that wouldn't fit on flash memory,
> so I like having the hard drive in there. But many people don't need it.
>
> So explain what you mean by 'does not work'. The 702 is just an
> option, they still sell 722s as well.
>
> Tim
>
> On Mar 13, 2007, at 3:05 PM, Rich Peet wrote:
>
> > I looked at the 702 and am not a fan of that product.
> > Why buy a unit that does not work.
> > The 702 is the 722 without the harddrive that can not be inserted by
> > the user.
> > I could have understood a 704 that contained 4 mic pre's that used the
> > space. Or a 702 that could have had the consumer install a harddrive
> > to make a 722.
> >
> > I own a 722 and usually record to the Flashdrive to save power.
> >
> > A Wisconsin based company should understand this way of thinking.
> >
> > Rich
> > who owns a 722
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
|