naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sound Devices 702

Subject: Re: Sound Devices 702
From: "Greg Weddig" gweddig
Date: Tue Mar 13, 2007 6:34 pm ((PDT))
Hi Michael,
I haven't done any official testing, but I have a 744t, Lunatec V2 and
V3.  To my ears the preamps are very close between these.  If you
would like I can probably do a comparison test but it won't be for a
few weeks.

--greg weddig

--- In  "Michael Oster" <>
wrote:
>
> Anyone with hands on experience on the 702 (or 722). I'm considering
purchasing the 702
> and wanted to know how its sound quality stood up to the Grace
Design Lunatec V2.
>
> My current setup is the Grace pre into either a DAT or Laptop (24
bits). I'd like to retire the
> DAT and not take the laptop out for field recording at all. If I
could drop the Grace but have
> that quality in one small box....
>
> Sound Devices has a great reputation so I figure that there probably
isn't better for that
> amount of money. But, maybe a few of you have already used it in the
field and could lend
> me your
> input.
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Michael Oster
> F7 Sound and Vision
> http://www.F7sound.com
>






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU