naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Audition 2.0?

Subject: Re: Audition 2.0?
From: "Rob Danielson" danielson_rob
Date: Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:44 pm (PDT)
At 10:13 AM -0300 9/14/06, Andrew Duke wrote:
>Anton Woldhek wrote:
>>
>>  I agree, 1.5 was a far better product. The only update in 2.0 is the
>>  interface (blech) and in VST (but its implemented crudely and half the
>>  plugins I work with don't work well with it.
>>
>  > Anton
>
>
>                        I bought the 2.0 download and had nothing but
>problems with it, so
>went back to using 1.5 and haven't yet had a chance to re-test 2.0.  I
>find it incredibly
>frustrating that Adobe don't offer free point updates to fix bugs.
>Andrew
>

I believe 2.0 added ASIO driver compatibility too. We only have two
installs of Audition 2.0 compared to 9 for Logic, but we haven't run
into debilitating bugs yet. The Eqium plug works okay, but with less
CPU efficiency than Logic. Audition is not as flexible as Logic or
ProTools but its not as daunting to learn and it costs about 1/3 as
much.  Audition shines in editing video with 5.1 sound. You can move
the files in a 5.1 mix from Premiere into Audition and back with
ease. We have a license that gives us free updates for three years,
but maybe this deal is only for schools. Rob D.
--
Rob Danielson
Peck School of the Arts
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
http://www.uwm.edu/~type/audio-art-tech-gallery/





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU