Subject: | Re: Audition 2.0? |
---|---|
From: | "Andrew Duke" andrewmduke |
Date: | Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:26 am (PDT) |
Anton Woldhek wrote: > > I agree, 1.5 was a far better product. The only update in 2.0 is the > interface (blech) and in VST (but its implemented crudely and half the > plugins I work with don't work well with it. > > Anton > I bought the 2.0 download and had nothing but problems with it, so went back to using 1.5 and haven't yet had a chance to re-test 2.0. I find it incredibly frustrating that Adobe don't offer free point updates to fix bugs. Andrew -- NSCC sound course http://andrew-duke.com/course.html Chain Reaction remix contest ends Sept 30: http://andrew-duke.com/contests.html Andrew Duke--Consumer vs. User album: http://www.phthalo.com/cat.php?cat=3Dphth40 artist features & column: http://cognitionaudioworks.com/read.html http://myspace.com/andrewduke |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Audition 2.0?, Anton Woldhek |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Audition 2.0?, Martyn Stewart |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Audition 2.0?, Anton Woldhek |
Next by Thread: | Re: Audition 2.0?, Martyn Stewart |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU