Hi all
I do have both. Just did a quick test in front of the TV with a sony MZ
RH10 using PIP. The 183 was 6 to 9 dB better than the 93. I remember
when trying to getting things working about 12 months ago, the 93 draws
more power using PIP and was surprised it worked with the RH10. I need
to recheck this but may influence the above results. It is going to be 2
weeks before I can get a chance to do a side by side comparison. Will be
interesting what Eric comes up with.
David
Eric Benjamin wrote:
> > Compare:
> > Shure WL93 Subminiature Omni Condenser Lavalier Microphone
> > vs.
> > Shure Lavaliere Omni Condenser Microphones WL-183
>
> To make things short, I will. I purchased four (I don't know WHY I did
> that!) WL93 mics and I will compare them directly to the WL-183
> microphones. I will make the measurements on both using Shure's in-
> line preamplifier which is supplied with the MX-183:
> http://www.shure. com/stellent/ groups/public/ @gms_gmi_
> web_us/documents /we
> <m("gms_gmi_web_us/documents/we","//www.shure.com/stellent/groups/public/");=">http:=
>
> b_resource/us_ pro_mx183_ mx184_mx185_ ug.pdf
>
> Eric Benjamin
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.4/364 - Release Date: 14/06/06
>
>
----------
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.4/364 - Release Date: 14/06/06
|