Subject: | Re: WL183 vs. WL93 |
---|---|
From: | "Walter Knapp" waltknapp |
Date: | Fri Jun 16, 2006 11:03 am (PDT) |
Posted by: "Rob Danielson" > Hi David-- > Great. The more we can correlate info the better. The gain difference > is consistent with the specs, but the WL93 should require less power > according to the specs (2 volt minimum compared to 5). Power is a function of both voltage and current. You need to check both. In this case I expect that the WL93 is drawing a lot more current (which would draw the PIP voltage down) Walt |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | about nature recording... in french..., Yannick Dauby |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: WL183 vs. WL93, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | about nature recording... in french..., Yannick Dauby |
Next by Thread: | Re: WL183 vs. WL93, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU