| Subject: | Re: WL183 vs. WL93 |
|---|---|
| From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
| Date: | Thu Jun 15, 2006 8:04 am (PDT) |
Rob Danielson, you wrote about the WL183 vs 93: >The gain difference is consistent with the specs, >but the WL93 should require less power according >to the specs (2 volt minimum compared to 5). I know 183s work well on 3V. -Dan Dugan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: WL183 vs. WL93, Rob Danielson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: WL183 vs. WL93, Rob Danielson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: WL183 vs. WL93, Rob Danielson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: WL183 vs. WL93, Rob Danielson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU