Subject: | Re: WL183 vs. WL93 |
---|---|
From: | "Walter Knapp" waltknapp |
Date: | Sat Jun 17, 2006 10:43 am (PDT) |
Posted by: "Rob Danielson" > My NH900 HiMD outputs 2.36 volts unloaded with a fresh AA alkaline > battery. When I measured the NH900 and RH910 PIPs circuits under > load with Klas's (primo em-23?) capsule, the voltage measured .42 > volts. Since PIP is a feed through a standard load resistor on most designs the current drawn is going to determine voltage across the mic. Unloaded voltage is pretty much meaningless as far as evaluating loaded performance. The better PIP designs draw very low current but it's not zero= . Walt |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: VP-88, was: Versitility of Telinga Stereo mic, Walter Knapp |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Budget Shotguns for Nature Recording, Walter Knapp |
Previous by Thread: | Re: WL183 vs. WL93, Eric Benjamin |
Next by Thread: | Re: WL183 vs. WL93, Secomb's |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU