naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Minimics from Microphone Madness for field recording?

Subject: Re: Minimics from Microphone Madness for field recording?
From: Walter Knapp <>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 15:09:27 -0500
From: "Rich Peet" <>


>>> What you are describing is a crude Jecklin disk setup. Hunt up info on 
>>> that. You'll find there are a bunch of variations.
>>> 
>>> To take care of handling noise you need some form of suspension between 
>>> you and the mic. A solid path carries the sound.
>>> 
>>> Walt
>>> 
> 
> 
> I don't think he is.  Sounds more like a conventional pzm barrier.

PZM would have the mic diaphragms facing the barrier, not facing 
forward. And the gap size would determine the frequency response.

> Nothing is more crude than a Jecklin disk and any modification will
> likely be an improvement over the commercial design.  I am still
> waiting to hear from anyone that says they like the sound of that
> setup for soundfields more than a couple feet away compared to
> anything else.  I like barriers but imho the Jecklin is poorly spendt
> time to build on your own and a big mistake to buy.

The Jecklin disk is a very elegant design, hardly crude.

I used the word crude only in that the mic setup described did not 
follow Juerg Jecklin's original design. It's well worth reading his 
paper, which is available online:
http://www.josephson.com/tn5.html
The disk shown on that page is not Jecklin's original design which used 
a 3/8" plywood core with a foam and sheepskin dampening layer.

It's a simple design, it is silly to pay the prices being asked for the 
commercial design. It is one of the easier designs to build, and if you 
follow all the design considerations Jecklin detailed it does work well. 
The problem is exactly that, folks make something that's a barrier, 
space mics somewhere apart and call it a Jecklin disk. That is a recipe 
for quite variable reports about it's quality. There is a considerable 
literature of folks who do use and like the sound of a properly built 
and set up Jecklin disk.

I prefer the SASS over the Jecklin disk, but the modified SASS is much 
more complex to make. Though it is less setup sensitive.

Walt




________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU