Subject: | Re: Minimics from Microphone Madness for field recording? |
---|---|
From: | Curt Olson <> |
Date: | Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:13:20 -0600 |
Walt judiciously corrects the record: > PZM would have the mic diaphragms facing the barrier, not facing > forward. And the gap size would determine the frequency response. Absolutely, Walt. I'm not pretending that my barrier array is any kind of PZM, nor do I think Rich believes it is. But it's definitely not a Jecklin disk either. We're straining here over broad comparisons -- word pictures. Maybe I should post a photo and a sample recording next week, and you all can tell me what to call it. So far, however, I like the way it sounds. I'll be doing some field testing this weekend. Gotta go -- on my way out of town... Curt Olson ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
Previous by Date: | Re: Minimics from Microphone Madness for field recording?, Curt Olson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Earth Hum, Greg Weddig |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Minimics from Microphone Madness for field recording?, Curt Olson |
Next by Thread: | Re: Minimics from Microphone Madness for field recording?, John Hartog |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU